Spray Tanning Slogan Ideas For New Years

Femininity released? Adoptions

The female body is devalued by a "repeated indecent representation of women as ostentatious naked traded sex offered by newspapers, television, advertising. "So stated the call for mobilization" if not now when, "but I'd be curious to know what kind of value you want linked to the sexual dignity of women.
feminists of the golden years in their magazine "Effe" - May 1976 - spoke of a sexual "free, active, which also aims to another, and can not be content with a gender that takes place only in the sphere intimate and private. Sexuality quietly admitting some differences, which states its possible "deviations", which confess without fear. "
From this definition, the step in the naked female "as an object of sexual exchange" is not so long: what is, in fact, the dignity of the female body after sexual liberation 35 years ago advocated by feminists of "Effe"?
Nothing, unless you want to argue that the only freedom is to do as he pleases. But then the wind of the "forbidden to forbid" was very violent, for example in 1967 in Florence, the congress of the Radical Party, was distributed a leaflet in which it was written that "the company pushes to criticize his authoritarianism the individual's right to freely dispose of his body, to enjoy the sensual pleasure. "
all began in the roaring 60's where the wings of the philosophy of Marcuse is theorized that freeing the instincts could eliminate both the domain and authority, they were kind of family, civil or religious.
During those years talking about virginity, underwear, contraceptives and positions of the Kama Sutra becomes a matter of course, on the wings of the battle for a strong female characters appear several signs that testify to the new way of being women, such as short skirts and tights, to burn the bra and the appearance of the first topless in Saint Tropez in 1970. In those years the psychiatric theorizing the sexual revolution gave manforte the need for "scientific" of this liberation of the individual, the English psychoanalyst David Cooper spoken to the women stated that they can love another being provided only to love themselves totally to the point of actually masturbating to orgasm.
So in 1973 the book "Donnie - Chronicles of feminism Roman" page. 7 is written the slogan "if we have children we want," consistent with the idea that the pleasure of the body has nothing to do with conception. We are obviously poles apart from the number recorded in 1968 the encyclical letter Humanae Vitae of Pope Paul VI pointed out where the inseparable link between the unitive and procreative sexual activity, it is no coincidence that the battle for abortion and contraception takes effect precisely from those areas of the liberation of female sexuality. And 'the 1975 closure of the famous "practice" CISA Florence (Italian Centre for Sterilization abortion) founded by Adele and I ended up under arrest for which the then twenty-seven Emma Bonino. From all these battles
perhaps the only thing that was truly "liberated" is the idolatry of the pleasure an end in itself, comes a strange concept of freedom then is paradoxically also met with some capitalist hedonism.
Morality is based on what you believe, but I would dare say that is rooted in the subject of our prayers. In this respect the above mentioned book "Woman ..." (1973) is this sentence: "if we ever will want to pray this will be our prayer: Mother I thank you for making me a woman." Amen.

(Source: Lorenzo Bertocchi, Freedom and person, February 17, 2011)

Found A Lump In My Anus

to singles: a sentence, much fanfare, a clumsy exit.

All this fuss about the Supreme Court ruling on the adoption of Russian children by a single Italian woman I do not understand it. Or maybe I understand only too well the retropensiero of who fired the news so upside down, distorting it, as if the Court of Cassation had launched a revolutionary new season of case law acknowledging for the first time single persons to adopt children.
The Supreme Court on the precise spot, he said the opposite. He said that the adoption of minors, Italian or foreign, can not be accorded to individuals. And it did not accept, but rejected the request. He was admitted, just as it was before, a report of a different nature, which in the jargon of the lawyers call "adoption mild" and that looks like a long-term expectations, but without the status of a legitimate child. The analysis of the rules of our system was accurate and timely, plus in the wake of previous decisions, one of which (dating more than five years ago) is exactly the same in the grounds and in the system: the possible adoption by married couples, and not by single. Nothing new under the sun.
But then, how did the clamor? Who has mounted, and why? Is that the last sentence of the sentence, just in the queue, said that the Strasbourg Convention of 1967 gives the legislature the power to expand the adoption legitimizing, if you would admit the individual. Has anyone seen this queue in the spark to light the fire of a revolution, the hope, the call, the warning to Parliament, and the need to open and who knows than anything else. Last night the Supreme Court has issued a statement saying that the meaning was not, no solicitations or demands. Unusual procedure firefighter on a fire invented by others?
For the legal logic, it is quite true that the Strasbourg Convention does not require and does not forbid and released by national legislators, and the phrase itself is flawless, so. Only it stuck there, a decision to talk over, like a wedge, it can seem really a kind of winking, then fade as to the logic of Mr. Venerable. Well unlike the Supreme Court in 2006, cited today as the source of this final thought, had defended his freedom of prohibition, because "the eligibility in principle the adoption of the single legitimating, in addition to light not unfounded doubts of constitutionality, would undermine the provisions of current legislation, "and so" deeply distorting the institute. " The phrase now is incomplete. It is not wrong, but is incomplete, and thus is even more wrong because it deceives.
the legislature "could", we already knew from before, without Strasbourg disengaged herself. But it will not, why not violate its constitution. Nor betray treaties that require obedience to all the choices in the best interest of the child, from which there is comparable to the desire of an individual endless supply of accommodation of adoptive mothers and fathers in the waiting list. With us, the same plant on the adoption law is entitled "Right of the child in a family." It does not say "assistance," says the family. And that family is defined in Article 29 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court knows it, and decided in a manner consistent, and that is what counts. Could save that output clumsy, that's all.

(Source: Joseph Anzalone, Future, 2/16/2011)

Speed Skater Underwear

scandal in London: the government wants gay marriage to church

Attentive Andrea Tornielli puts us aware of how things are going in the English house. What should make us think is that so many of our politicians who call themselves Catholics, did not hesitate to ally and openly flirting with the current Italian political secular, and designed an identical "social achievement" for our country. According to which Catholic principles? For the achievement of such "rights" religious and ethical? It is clear that this duplicity on the part of "our" representatives (but "our" to whom?, Not the Catholics!) Is intended only to protect their own interests, keep your lower back firmly to the throne of power! Other than non-negotiable principles. Here, everything is negotiable, from personal dignity up to their beliefs religious. If they had any. We think a moment about the various Bindi, Franceschini, Prodi, Casini, Rutelli & Co. Instead of preening on television, filling his mouth banal platitudes, standing as champions of the moral sense and the restatement of Christian values \u200b\u200b(perhaps these Carnival for their help to this?) would do well to make a serious examination of conscience. But maybe they do not have time, I'm too busy! But we feel Tornielli: "Homosexual persons in the United Kingdom will be able to bless the wedding in their places of worship and the government of his majesty will recognize. The news yesterday emblazoned on the front pages of the Telegraph and the Sunday Times. Within the next few days could then drop the ban now in force, which prohibits conduct the ceremonies of civil unions between homosexual persons in religious buildings. The reform, according to the plan that has been studied by the British Minister for Equal Opportunities, the Liberal Democrat Lynne Featherstone, will therefore contain religious elements such as hymns and reading of sacred books, and will be presided over by priests, pastors, rabbis and other ministers religious.
In Britain, civil unions for gays and lesbians were introduced in 2005 and the legislation provides that they must have a secular course absolutely no religious elements. Even if, before the law, States United States civil same-sex couples have the same rights as those formed by a man and a woman who joined during a religious ceremony, the effects of which civilians are recognized by the state.
It is clear that the reform, opening the possibility of blessing of the marriage for gay people, will help to thin almost all the differences between civil unions and traditional marriage. Suday The Times explains that the proposed reform of the Marriage Act would also permanently change the legal definition of marriage as a union only between a man and a woman. The decision would therefore have a high symbolic value. "The government is considering what should be the next step for civil unions, such as some religious organizations can help to same-sex couples to register their relationship in a religious context if they want to do it, "said an Interior Ministry spokesman. "The ministers have met a number of people and organizations - he added - in due course an announcement will be made."
The Church of England, although in the past two decades has introduced many liberal reforms, has already responded letting them know that will not allow such ceremonies in their religious buildings. "The proposal - said a spokesman for the Anglican - could have an unexpected impact and lead to confusion." The Anglican community, however, are very diverse, and there are cases of the wedding blessing gay. As well as cases of Anglican priests who have publicly stated that living with another man.
Other Christian religious groups, such as Quakers and Protestant denominations, as well as the liberal British Jews, are available to accommodate these ceremonies in their respective places of worship.
In Italy, a few months ago the news of blessing the union of two lesbians by the Waldensian pastor of Trapani and Marsala. While the Catholic Church, since the seventies, and similar ceremonies were celebrated by the semi-clandestine Catholic priest Don Franco Barbero, then dismissed from the clerical state as a result of this activity in direct conflict with the magisterium. In July 2003, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, then headed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, published a document, approved by Pope John Paul II, to declare all the opposition of the Catholic Church and the recognition of homosexual unions, which "obscure basic values \u200b\u200bwhich belong to the common heritage of mankind."

(Source: Andrea Tornielli, Il Giornale, 14 February 2011)

People Who Refuse Gifts

No, dear Tarquinio: the procession is not a Christian moralist

not convince me, and I do not mean to debate the future of editorial released yesterday and signed by its director, Mark Tarquinio, whose daring costume intellectual states that if a woman would be in place today. The disguise not so much to imagine a woman as any novelist, even if not necessarily homosexual, must constantly cope with the diversity - in thought and body - of which we are all facts.
What is not persuaded that Tarquin would be in place only if it were a woman. But since it is not, will not go there. Why? There will be Antonio Di Pietro, Nichi Vendola, Gad Lerner: Why should not there also Mark Tarquinio? Why should it be present at that time only if it were a woman? Why settle for hoping that the square-female "and not s'arrovelli s'arroventi 'if not then he will be there, to contribute to this effect?
In short, it seems to me that Tarquin, although the level of his speech, which are not foreign accents really lyrical, in the end not just the stories, because if you tell it right, if you really wanted, as he himself wrote the first line of his editorial , to prevail on politichetta love, then it should put your finger in the pie, because we know that love does not prevail on politichetta alone, and that's good wishes and good intentions are part, of course, the paving of ' hell.
He says it himself - and on this I disagree - that "in reality we all unfortunately." If you really believe in this thing, then go to the end. In the square. A scream. But I still do not believe in this resistance and (possibly empty Tarquinio judge) I find one of the few reasons to engage intellectually in these sad days in which each of us seems forced to choose between the silly and the joy of the bunga bunga gloom moralist of Eco, Saviano and Zagrebelsky.
The reality is, beloved Tarquin and ultrapersonale numinous entity: the reality does who wants to do, whether secular or Catholic or even a bishop. Look what he wrote in 1973, or thirty years ago, the Jesuit Michel de Certeau: "Any debate about the practices or civil life in the public arena invariably brings an ecclesiastical character and speeches religious. These characters and this conversation no longer intervene as witnesses of truth. They play quite a role play. They are part of the repertoire of social commedia dell'arte. "
goes without saying that the problem of degradation reached by the image of women in our society exists. But I do not underestimate, as it does Tarquin, the problem of "non-passing of the baton 'between the old feminist movement, which includes figures of heroic women, and the young generation of our time.
In fact, that failure to pass lies a problem that affects us all. There was a time when the feminist movement could assert itself culturally with a protagonist who, however, did not, leaving too soon absorbed by the Left parties (who were sexist as all other) or refusing to supervise the dangerous receivers, such as that of liberation through sexuality.
For years we've peeled the glossy magazines left in the image of a topless woman was a symbol of emancipation, as well as the refusal of the family and the ruthlessness of the costumes in the spirit of renewal of society were considered the ne plus ultra of the fight for the liberation of women.
This confusion, which were unable to cope with the minds of great value, is unresolved, not only for the image of women, but - metaphorically - For all our lives. There was a time when the thought, thinking as such, ie the ability to think freely, and justified in our condition, has been absorbed in a vacuum of freedom in which even the finest minds have been reduced to theatrical appearances, to actors, just as the prelates he was talking about Michel de Certeau.
What do you think I care, dear Tarquinio, a square with Di Pietro, Nichi Vendola, Game Aulenti and Cortellesi? What words can we expect to hear? The dramatic conditions in which many of our poorest children to without even realizing it will not receive any light from this event, indeed: his uselessness could only produce a little ' of hope in the least, a bit 'more of darkness.
One thing I beg you, she runs a day so important and potentially free: Forget the reality shows and comedy, and stop with the usual old story of cattolichese "differentiate by participating," as she does, approving the But putting the dots on the square i. Enough with the dots on the i. Everyone should put the game away in the sunshine.
As for me, I hope every day in God, so my words are not empty as those who claim to fight. No one can be considered a priori the side of truth, let alone if it catholic. For this, dear Tarquinio, let us beware of those who, instead - And today there are many - it is considered such.

(Source: Andrea Tornielli, Il Giornale, 13 February 2011)

Sample Invites To A Clothes Exhibition

Toh! From that pulpit!

There they are, today, the companions of the time. They did not make the revolution, but many have careers and money. And the arrogance is often remained the same. Under the gray hair and baldness roars again the young fanatic ever since.
The only revolution that have made - or rather, who have served - was the sexual revolution. For the consumption of the consumer society. Today, the belly, bobbing behind their tie of wealthy journalists, powerful politicians, university barons, warns and rebukes. E - behold! - What?
against the unbridled sex (obviously not his own but that of Berlusconi). Frowning pontificating against sex disposable weave prayers on the moral dignity of women, teach us the sacred respect for the female body, preach moral rigor. In some cases, from a life of a generation that has known - after the sexual anarchy of youth - a succession of marriages and relationships ...
The show is amazing. Perhaps it is even an opportunity for reflection. I have refrained until now from writing about the miseries of the news and I answered no to some political talk shows who wanted to invite me to "judge a Catholic" the "nights of Arcore. However
weeks I see and hear some former revolutionaries, inspired air and virginal purity, raise their loud cry against those who profane pictures with scantily clad "women's bodies", against those whose sexual mores and wild - in disbelief - I rub my eyes .
Not only remembering the youth seasons. I wonder: what newspapers have written so far? Which week? What had the cover? Women wearing burkas? And what books have launched? What films and filmmakers who have exalted? What costumes have practiced and legitimized? What moral claimed?
Suddenly everyone seems to have become castigatissimi censors. It was inevitable that such a band of Puritans is next to Oscar Luigi Scalfaro being, he, a bigot of the first hour. Remember the episode that made "immortal"? It made the scene in the fifties to a lady, accidentally caught a glimpse of the restaurant, guilty of having a low-cut dress. The event "for the dignity of women", therefore, will attend this Scalfaro. And I read that
Republic "will also attend Nichi Vendola: Another Italian history is possible, there is a better Italy for which women are not cannon fodder, commercialization of bodies, the stars in only one establishment to escort".
Yes, dear Nichi (in the role the moral theologian), Italy this exists. Are you sure that is exactly what you want for decades?
is left of this wonderful slogan: "I'm man enough to say." But enough for what? The famous "sexual freedom"? The slogan "the body is mine and manage it? A sessuomania this mass?
Let's talk. Last May I took part in an episode of "Annozero" on priests and pedophilia. It was very interesting, but I remember when I tried to broaden the horizon by proposing to analyze the (often pathological) sessuomania mass that characterizes our customs and our culture, Santoro broke off the conversation move on. Not considered interesting. Yet this is the stifling atmosphere.
I am a father, I have young daughters and it sucks a society where young women - in any environment! - Are discriminated against if they are not in the game or do not accept certain compromises. It sucks a society where girls or boys are branded as idiots if they say they believe in chastity or virginity.
Or where you are considered dangerous if a person says that marriage is only between a man and woman, if you insist to say that gender is not an opinion (that nature - either male or female - is debatable), if you consider divorce an evil, whether it condemns abortion, the morning after pill and if you dare question the "sacred condom revered by the dominant culture.
Some people try to yank some Christians to wrest their excommunication of the sinner Berlusconi. Gad Lerner has amplified the voice of the nun who thundered, "It is not lawful" against the Cav as the Baptist against Herod.
Good. But with the nun - About Erode - thunder "it is not lawful," even against a dominant culture that has to be global, legalized abortion in the coming fifty years to score a billion, a culture that increasingly lower the level of protection of human life.
And I would remind the little nun that John the Baptist thundered especially against the hypocrisy of the scribes and Pharisees, he called: "You brood of vipers."
Even Jesus will thunder against them. He shows compassion for the sinners, tax collectors and prostitutes, but not for the "whitewashed tombs" that points the finger at other people's sin: "they are beautiful to look at the outside, but inside are full of dead men's bones and all rot. "
E 'of all of us talking. Because of a great sinner like Zacchaeus, Jesus can make a saint, a great saint like Paul or Augustine. But of those who presume to judge others, the whitewashed tombs? Moreover they will be with his finger pointed at Jesus' right under the cross.
were saying the event for the dignity of women. Will defend the dignity trampled on Muslim women on the continent?
and dignity of Christian women in Pakistan, the dignity of Asia Bibi, a young mother sentenced to death, still held and subjected to any humiliation, for the Christian?
E 'Christianity which required women to recognize their dignity.
Roberto Benigni himself, commenting on the "prayer to the Virgin" of Dante, had this to say: "God himself has since asked Mary her yes or no that its women gained the right to say yes or no" .
Just yesterday we were celebrating St. Agatha, Virgin and martyr. The story of this young man in the third century shows us the only true revolution that restored dignity to women. Certainly not the culture of the Republic and the Espresso or the common (or, of course, the television culture). But only Jesus Christ.

(Source: Anthony Socci, synthesis Available in The Citadel, February 8, 2011)

Bmi For Women Over 20

The protest of the 143 theologians and secular faith in the West of double standards

was the time of the Cologne Declaration, ie for more than twenty years, so numerous that a cartel theologians do not put together to produce a document against the centralism of Rome calling for reforms to the Church.
Centoquarantatrè professors of faculties Theological German, Swiss and Austrian announced in recent days, a text entitled "Church 2011 - a change necessary." What do you ask? Of course, "radical reforms", such as the abolition of compulsory celibacy for priests of the Latin rite, and therefore open to the ordination of married men, the adoption of 'structures at all levels of the Synod of the Church ", the involvement selection process of the faithful priests and bishops, openness to women "in the ministry of the Church", the welcome of gay couples and the divorced and remarried.
The signatories believe that only by opening up to these reforms, precisely "a necessary turning point," the Church will accelerate again and go back to talking to the men and women of the twenty-first century. The list does not appear at all surprising. Those who believe the theologians who signed the proposals are in fact needed to be done very well known and debated for decades.
Some of these appear to be very self-referential and clerics. It is true, for example, that the decline in vocations is beginning to be a problem in the West, and it is true that in Germany and Austria there are many cases of priests who live with women and do not hide it, but really the abolition of rule of celibacy is the answer to this situation? Again, really the answer to the crisis of faith is open to women in ministry the Church? I really think that a change in doctrine on homosexuality would lead to refill the half-empty churches?
Just look at what happened in the Anglican Church to realize that the answer to secularization secularization can not be another, as evidenced by the constant hemorrhage of the faithful in spite of the increasingly liberal place (up from the priesthood and the episcopate to women 'openness to gay priests living together). What is striking about the 143 initiative is the fact that theologians are cyclically re-open questions without taking into account the fact that these issues reflected the teachers' union and has taken more than once.
Yet, despite pronouncements, encyclicals, pastoral letters, papal intervention, it is as if every time you ripartisse from scratch. Themes proposed in the document there is only one that really has to do with the experience of a number, unfortunately, more and more people, and that's about the attitude of the divorced and remarried and the question of the sacrament Eucharist.
Benedict XVI, homily Saturday at the ordination of five new bishops, said: "The pastor must not be a reed swamp which bends according to the wind, a servant of the spirit of the time. Being brave, the courage to oppose the current of the moment belongs to an essential task of the shepherd. It should not be a reed swamp, but - according to the image of the first Psalm - it must be like a tree that has deep roots in what is solid and well founded. This has nothing to do with the rigidity ol'inflessibilità. Only where there is stability there is also growing. "
Of course, the Pope spoke of bishops, not the theologians. But these words offer food for thought for all. We are very confident that the 'change necessary' to strengthen their faith in the secularized and de-Christianized society should have to do with church ministries, the discipline of celibacy, etc..? The
11 May 2010, in Lisbon, the Pope said: "It is perhaps putting too much trust in the structures and programs of the Church, the distribution of powers and functions, but what will happen if the salt becomes tasteless?.
Two days later, Fatima, said: "When, in the views of many, the Catholic faith is no longer the common heritage of society and often seen as undermined and overshadowed by a seed" gods "and the lords of this world very difficult it can touch hearts by a simple conversation or moral appeals, much less through general references to Christian values \u200b\u200b... What fascinates above all is an encounter with people who believe that through their faith, to attract the grace of Christ, bearing witness to Him. "

(Source: Andrea Tornielli, The Daily Compass, 7 February 2011)

Break Sentinel Dongletime Limit

The Paolini

Pasolini interested in reading about when he wrote against abortion, and conversely the Meeting in Rimini listened Testori: impressed us words and the depth of thought, and their sexual preferences known left us completely indifferent.
's just on the merits, then, that talk about the choice to enter a written Nichi Vendola among the ideas proposed to the priests for the Lenten sermons of this year, in a liturgical-pastoral published by Paolini. Notwithstanding that, the comparison with two great Italian culture does not encourage the governor of Puglia, some doubt arises rather scrolling the selected piece (a letter to the deceased bishop of Nichi compatriot Don Tonino Bello, written and published a year ago), for example when Vendola said Don Tonino hear a "poignant nostalgia of your cosmogony," or when he asks: "Where is the Passover of social responsibility and cultural conviviality?", or even when accused: "There are those who would like to put on a Ku Klux Klan version of Po. Can frankly hard to take them as starting points for clarifying a deep reflection on the mystery Resurrection of Our Lord, but so be it. The point, however, is another.
Vendola The letter is accompanied by a box, inserted by the editors of the book, titled "Wisdom of the Fathers", with an episode in the life of a great monaco the fourth century, Bessarion, which "happened in a church during the sermon's touched to hear the priest cast a sinner, unworthy of being considered among the good people. Bessarion did not move an eyelid, he got up and walked out with him saying, 'I too am a sinner'. "
At this point a question naturally arises in us all, sincere and enthusiastic members of the fan club monaco Bessarion: we wonder if the piece is not is not a huge excusat petita an incredible own goal in short, those who chose the song for Easter meditations. If so, whether the citation of Monaco was really a stop right who might turn up their nose to the meditations of Nichi Vendola placed alongside those of Mother Teresa of Calcutta, then we wonder also whether the publishers of liturgical Pauline are the same publishers Famiglia Cristiana magazine, that a year ago was meditating on the theme: "Communion in Berlusconi's right?" the same as always with respect to the prime minister, has put the question to readers of his "state of the disease, something uncontrollable. " In short, two sinners, two measures? And Bessarion would agree? At least for Lent one should meditate on. Unless it is the beginning of a rethinking of Pauline, which next year will bring us to meditate on a thought of the Cav.

(Source: Assuntina Morresi, The Gazette, February 2, 2011)