Credit Suisse Singapour

Radio London: a lone voice against the hypocrisy

Today, at 20:30 on Rai Uno began Radio London, the daily strip by Giuliano Ferrara. A good, very good news. Finally, as with the joy of the illegal regime that defies the tune in a clear voice, we will be able to hear the first time in a voice far different from the monoculture that has reigned in RAI. Finally, we will have a daily period to activate the brain.
giulianone said he will not spare anyone except the Pope Another good, very good news. Ferrara, moreover, is the leader of those strange lay devotees who are the real novelty in the Italian cultural scene. So far, even here, the only model prevailing in TV public was to Augias Conrad, a member of a bigoted and reactionary anti-clericalism. It is beautiful and useful to hear a different voice, from the pack.
A voice, above all, who does not want to be a hypocrite, like the ones the other day to the streets waving the Constitution and listened to Mr. Ingroia, magistrate, who attacked the government on a reform of the justice that has not even arrived in Parliament. You can wave the Constitution and see, simultaneously, to its destruction. This is the hypocrisy of which I speak.
Ferrara will definitely go down in a heavy, using the right to freedom of opinion which can not be just a privilege of Santoro, Saviano, Fazio and Travaglio. Already today denounced in an editorial that "the partisan struggle of part of the judiciary against the legislature, unprecedented in a country any liberal, is an institutional scandal." And then explained the three simple reasons to reform the justice. Here they are.
1) The separation of careers is something very appropriate and in fact already in place in other countries. The investigating magistrate must be equated with the defender, while judges who must stand above the parties.
2) The magistrate must be accountable to citizens when exercising their profession. Currently, the law is not equal for everyone. The magistrates destroy, when they are wrong, persons, and never pay. We need to change.
3) It can not be tried a second time after being acquitted: "Here the principle is that you can give sentence on the basis of free conviction of the judge, a purely subjective criterion. But that freedom must be anchored to the objectivity of the court to a certainty as the basis for a review in due process. "
On the reform proposed by the government is registering the widespread public and that a little 'far-fetched "third pole. On the other hand, it is really difficult to take a contrary position prejudicially without giving the impression being made of the interests of caste (the judges) or, more simply, you do not want to give in to Berlusconi, simply because after we could no longer say that "did nothing". Especially since it is clear that this reform will take time for approval, a longer process to be carried on the prime minister. Apart from the usual Di Pietro with its peons, who, as usual, is making a fool is Bersani. Which again is only able to say "no ruling.
And finally, those in mid-stream it is the judges, strongly tempted to defend themselves as a caste, reaching even to threaten a strike (as if they were taxi drivers) which is something inconceivable. If the Judiciary is one of the state, noted the other day Ostellino Piero, has its own channels in order to defend his case (and this is the point at which it is quite disgraceful performance of Mr. Ingroia square, which is not can defend itself with a simple "I expressed my opinion). The show that some judiciary is offering us is disturbing, "because - writes Ostellino - show a level of degradation and de-legitimization of institutions undermines the very foundations of our democracy. (...) Here is questioning the credibility of the constitutional state. "
short, there is something at stake very important. And that's why I greet with joy the return of Ferrara on TV and I tune in every day with his Radio London. Do we need fresh air and someone who has the courage to speak out from the crowd!

(Source: Gianluca Zappa, The Citadel, March 13, 2011)

Sample Tamil Marriage Invitation Wordings

school: sex with children

The news comes from the weekly Times: "After the courses mandatory sexual Zapatero of Spain, the United Kingdom as many as 16 municipalities have decided to introduce sex education even in kindergarten. The manuals are obscene. A mo 'comics are seen parents having sex, complete with explanations of the positions possible and how is the act, with explicit mention of penises and vaginas. The lesion of the right to freedom of education is that over the Christian Institute English are the same parents to rebel. "
So goes the world, friends. There are people around who, without any sense of decency, the limit of sensitivity and respect that should be for children, propagates a very early initiation of sex, but for now, and just for now, hopefully, theoretical. These people know full well what kind of political-ideological training comes from. They are the heralds of a hellish mix that brings together left and relativistic nihilism. Obscene and disastrous ideology, whose devotees are the stupid servants (when well-meaning) of world economic power that has to make money with everything. Actually, he already wrote: Just read "Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, who in 1932 staged this killing and the violence on children (in the novel, the boys started right away, and so required, to toys sex, which are part of the state school).
This new culture of the state, this single thought that spares no one, is literally imposed from above, and it becomes very difficult to oppose. I read for example, always on time , who last March 9, "was sentenced to 43 days in captivity in 2006 a mother who had refused to pay a fine of 2340 € for refusing to participate in their children against sexual courses to their Christian beliefs. Now, advocates of women, members of an institute for religious freedom, appealed to the European Court of Human Rights. Unfortunately, the Court always judges from federal and state laws and school is compulsory in Germany, so that for the same reason a family is staying in America with asylum for persecution of a fundamental freedom. "
And in Italy? We had to put up the morale of scum who got to watch the premier private only to give the famous "shoulder" (the one that never comes). It was the triumph of moralism of scum that has an ideological agenda in the lead very, very similar to that of Spain and the UK, which campaigns scum because there are vending machines in schools of condoms, scum who daily derides any talk on modesty, chastity, respect, continence, and then be offended if someone in his private acts like everyone wants to behave.
They want to give a shove to the "pig" to take power and then make us all ask ourselves cheerfully. It is the communism of the pigsty. Not say these things, not make them public if they keep hidden. But we know very well where to hang, what they really want. If you do not admit it because they have a damned afraid of losing votes yet, literally disappearing from the national political scene. Can not speak, and in fact do not even know what their program. They just shocked, to distance, to whimper.
say that Italy is our disgraced abroad. Points of view. We also disgraced, but at least, at least for now, there are imposed on the pigs that are made in Spain, the United Kingdom, Germany. Those nations that have so disgraced, to be ashamed of. That means that it is a school policy and educational degenerate, inhuman, criminal. In those countries the family has to suffer the dictates of a state school that passes easily on the consciences, the values, education imparted by parents.
This scum has the moral issue in the closet, like a skeleton uncomfortable. We must unmask, anyway, should reproach that stupid and ideological destruction of any value on human sexuality, pernicious legacy of the revolution of the sixties and we must pull down from the pulpit on which loves to lie, by showing that it is not worthy of any pulpit.
And do not need many words: it takes events like those occurring in the United Kingdom. Moreover, the tree is known by its fruits more ...

(Source: Gianluca Zappa, The Citadel, March 10, 2011)

Gum Spur After Extraction

The blood of martyrs who defeated communism

The word "martyrdom" is not a concept to be relegated to the imagination of the early Church. It characterizes every moment and every age of Christianity, and today we have a dramatic response in Asia, particularly in the Middle East. Last century, moreover, marked a dramatic return of anti-Christian persecution, which is what most emblematic moment of the oppression of totalitarian regimes, in their various forms.
Most of these martyrdoms occurred under the communist regimes. The subject was addressed by the historian and theologian George Weigel, biographer of Pope John Paul II, who in recent months is facing so systematically the issue through a series of lectures in the United States and Europe, entitled The Communist War Against the Church. New Evidences from the Past and Lessons for the Future . "Twenty years after the collapse of the Berlin Wall - Weigel says - the memory of all that is fading." Yet we are talking about a real war that fielded spies, moles, secret agents, propaganda, disinformation, to the final solution of the gulag.
A major contribution of unpublished news comes from well-known "Mitrokhin archive" in this and other sources for Weigel drew his last biography of John Paul II, The End and the Beginning. Pope John Paul II - The Victory of Freedom, the Last Years, the Legacy, released in the U.S. last September. "The war against Communism, the Catholic Church - said Weigel - the ways in which it was conducted, the Church of resistance (some failures, some success) is an important warning for the future, as well as a contribution to the clarification of the past. Since the October Revolution, the Church was for the Soviets a 'mortal threat to their plans and interests'. " While the USA was the main military and political opponent, the Vatican was the main ideological adversary, as well as the main obstacle in exporting the ideals Marxists, in the Third World, particularly in Latin America.
Against this background lies the Soviets was sensational: Throughout the Cold War, the Kremlin denied it ever, even in diplomatic relations with the Holy See, any persecution of Christians behind the Iron Curtain. Lying and consciously lies the Soviet foreign minister has repeatedly held that in their country of religious freedom was protected. In the last years of the Cold War, however, were primarily services the Soviets to supply the black legend of pope Pius XII anti-Semitic and conniving with the Nazis. Destroy the reputation of the Catholic Church and its chief representative was the only way for the triumph of real socialism.
The first three decades of communism, are characterized by a more or less tenacious resistance from the national churches: emblematic in this sense, they are figures such as Cardinal Ukrainian Josyf Slipyi for almost twenty years imprisoned in the gulag, or of Bishop Aloysius Stepinac, Croatian controversial bishop, considered a martyr and a fascist by the anti-communists, as alleged collusion with the Ustasha regime. In this first phase, the historical figure "winning" is, however, notably that of the primate of Poland, Stefan Wyszynski, a witness of faith in a country rust Catholic who managed to resist the orthodox, Protestant, and in the last century, to Nazism and communism.
In the 60s the convening and conduct of the Second Vatican Council, with the arrival in Rome of many bishops behind the Iron Curtain, it represented a wonderful opportunity for the KGB, the Stasi, the SB and all intelligence services of European communist regimes to take stronger control of the Vatican from the inside. The Ostpolitik of Pope John XXIII, he pushed a strategy of caution toward the opponent, who on many occasions proved to be skillful in his work of corruption of many prelates and curial officials.
In 1978 the election to the papacy of Cardinal Karol Wojtyla, archbishop of Krakow and worthy disciple of Wyszynski, sparigliò cards the table. Since the '50s, Wojtyla was considered a real loose cannon for the stability of communism in Poland. Became pontiff, John Paul II was well aware that the communist secret services were well established in the Vatican, changed the strategy: "The documents, which deal with Poland and other sensitive business - says Weigel - were no longer entrusted to the Secretary of State but kept all ' inside the papal apartment, away from speculation. " That Slavic pope was considered a "subversive", responsible for an "ideological struggle" aimed at damaging the socialist regimes. The failed attempt on the life of the pope on May 13, 1981 represented by no means the end of the war communism to the Church. A few months later, in fact, Poland is proclaimed martial law and repression intensifies. Among the martyrs of this difficult transition figure Jerzy Popieluszko, chaplain of Solidarity, a Polish priests loyal to the pope and most fiercely anticommunist. The war was total and unconditional ceasefire.
The first lesson to be learned from this story is that "Catholicism and Communism - Weigel said - and gave the world two radically different visions of human nature, human community, human origins and human destiny." In other words: they were incompatible with one hundred percent. It is from this incompatibility that resulted in the strategy of John Paul II, who was second in an ongoing real struggle between Good and Evil and the pursuit of a victory of freedom over tyranny was something much more visionary than a political compromise and Social evolution in the sense of both blocks.
that of religious freedom remains an open question in many communist countries, post-communist (China, Vietnam, North Korea, Cuba) or Islamic, whose regimes, so not too sheer, inspired by the Nazis or Leninism. But history has taught us that "appeasement did not work nor Napoleon, nor with the anti-clerical regimes English or Mexican and even in the region of, after the Nazi Anschluss, "says Weigel. Just also look at conditions in which the Catholic communities in Eastern Europe: Czech Republic and Hungary, where the acquiescence of the bishops to totalitarian regimes reached its highest level, the church is in deep crisis. Exactly the opposite of what is happening in Lithuania, Ukraine and especially in Poland.
The other great lesson for the future concerns the relationship between the Catholic Church and Russian Orthodox Church, and between the Vatican and Russia. The church of Rome and Moscow are in fact united by the extraordinary number of martyrs who have shed their blood during communism. And it is the blood martyrs in our time, the seed of the Christian victory. "Their sacrifice - Weigel concludes - and what can we learn about the virtue of fortitude (ie, courage) will never be forgotten."

(Source: Luke Marcolivio, The Ottini, March 16, 2011)

How To Put On A Walking Cast

The crisis of the Italian Risorgimento and

On the sidelines of the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy. "Italy is made, it remains to make Italians."

is the most famous phrase in Italian history, delivered in those fateful days of unification by one of its most intelligent players, Massimo d'Azeglio, already critical and disenchanted.
not easy to explain how profound truth there was in this statement, which still constitutes a source of reflection and debate among historians and political scientists. In this bold and provocative sentence contains in nuce the whole issue of the Italian Revolution: the unification had not been implemented just as the Italians already were homeless and suffered from it? The movements, plots, conspiracies, attacks, wars, had not been made to free Italians from intolerable and brutal oppression of foreign and indigenous?
Furthermore, another is not a minor issue: the Italians, "you do"? A population is created by the war and plebiscites, or people there already? And if you get to feel like a need expressed by d'Azeglio (which it may be the reasons and beyond the question provocatively), not perhaps one should not conclude that the unification was not wanted and felt by Italian populations but has been imposed on them by a political and social elite?
As you can see, these issues can be found in the main causes of dysfunction that 150 years from tearing society and national history, and in particular it exists, more immediately, one in all, the most serious, the most unresolved : the division of our people. Just the very principle of "having make Italians "shows that he had deliberately renounced the ancient Italian identity in the name of a new road, antithetical to the true Italian civilization, and subversive. It was chosen
short of denying and destroying the real Italy (in fact, that the protagonists of the Risorgimento - and with them all in the decades following risorgimentisti - called "Old Italy") in the name of "the new Italy." Namely, an Italy that no longer universal, no longer Catholic, soon to even more monarchical in short, no more "Roman" and, therefore, not "Italian." It was necessary in other words "make Italians", as if always existed, that is different from the way they always were and they wanted to stay.
in recent decades has started (and is growing ever more intense and engaging) a review of historical events - and their players - which led the Italian national unification process of the Risorgimento and the consequences on the national history of the twentieth century . A nucleus growing number of professors, historians and political scientists began to question certain aspects of the Italian Risorgimento and specific moments that were too easily encoded by the current dominant historiography - and then presented to generations of Italians for decades - as assumed indisputable, and on which we wanted to establish the 'collective imagination "of the Italian people as regards their national state.
In particular, there are some ideal times more precise and dramatic history that some nodes are more concerned these scholars. The first among them to attract the interest of historians has been, since the sixties, the revolt of the southern populations against the unitary process in defense of the Church and the Bourbon dynasty, known as "banditry" antiunitario, now rich topic of study the investigation, but that does not stop certain to stir controversy and division among experts and among the uninitiated. In the same vein is located antigiacobine the problem of outbreaks that occurred after the Napoleonic invasion: now, from "taboo" in our history, truly mystified and boycotted for decades, in recent years has become one of the most exciting page.
Over the past few years, then, is also flowering studies of Catholic, aiming to re-process the Risorgimento in the specific aspect of the war the church heroic conduct under the guise of national unification. The war against the Catholic Church and local traditions carried from the Risorgimento had as its object the death of the Pope as the Papal States to unification, but of the Pope as the Catholic Church, Like many of the most famous and lesser-known players of those days always had to declare publicly and testifying by their actions: it was a war conducted without scruple of any sort, which wounded deep in the Catholic identity of the Italians.
But, since the eighties, other aspects of the unification of Italy and united movement of the twentieth century and have been reviewed by various authors and historians, often non-Catholic - though not anti-Catholic - (sectarian terrorist Mazzini, the farce of the plebiscites, the endemic corruption, the emigrazionismo, nationalism, and then the Great War, Fascism son of the Risorgimento, September 8 and the "death of the fatherland" ideological civil war and hatred, etc.., to this day).
The conclusion, in different ways and for different routes, has always been the same, however: the finding of no real unity of the Italians, namely the apparent failure of what was the very purpose of the Risorgimento, the creation of a new national identity for Italians. It's a whole world of cultural and ideological beginning to falter under the pressure of the need and desire for the truth about the history of our people will finally be known by all.

(Source: Massimo Viglione, Roman Match, March 12, 2011)

Sure Cure Of Ankylosing Spondylitis

The heroism of Shahbaz Bhatti, a martyr for Christ

Shahbaz Bhatti was a man in search of fame. Although Pakistani government minister, ran without an escort. It was not even a "political" in the common meaning of the term. That for minorities was for him a true vocation, and in his country the concept of minority is not the West, referring to the normal interplay of public opinion in which those who have more free votes in government and those who are less comply, and can peacefully express their dissent.
Being in the minority in Pakistan is synonymous with marginalization, isolation, poverty, and persecution. The biggest mistake of Bhatti was to belong to these minorities, as a Christian. His greatest strength was to be a true Christian, that is without compromise with the world and with the knowledge that their mission does not end with death and violence of the enemies will never win. But who was really
Shahbaz Bhatti and why the Islamic fundamentalists have so brutally murdered on 2 March? He himself describes: "I just want a place at the feet of Jesus I want my life, my character, my actions speak for me and say that I am following Jesus." Words that would do credit to any Christian, any place and time. Bhatti, however, was born and lived in Pakistan of the twenty-first century: a country where freedom of religion is limited and where there is the shameful laws against blasphemy and blasphemous to where (the face of religious freedom and secularism that the Europeans love it ...) you do not intend any offense to worship only and exclusively to Allah and Islam, which is devoted 96% of the population. And probably no country in the Islamic religious intolerance is reaching alarming levels as in Pakistan since the case of Asia Bibi has become known to international public opinion, for Christians there is no truce while the 45 year old farmer of Punjab risk stoning for having politely criticized the prophet Mohammed, the On 4 January, the governor of that province, Salman Taseer (Muslim), was assassinated by his bodyguard for having expressed their opposition to the blasphemy law. In Pakistan, fundamentalist violence is not so much a political issue as a cultural problem, sadly rooted in the people. The government in Islamabad - which Shahabz Beat, the only Christian minister was part - tepidly condemned the attacks and is proving powerless (perhaps conniving?) Before the destructive fury of the fanatics. On the other hand, there is a large part of religious people blinded by hate. Not only the application of the blasphemy law is far restrictive and that many sentences are imposed for specious reasons: he is acquitted he sees his life endangered, vulnerable to attacks by fanatics who seek to summary justice in place of the courts. The few Christians in the country, for their part, have a hard time turning the other cheek. Has aroused great anger because the government's decision to block, for safety reasons, the entrance to the church where the funeral was held the minister killed: even the victim's family have been left out.
The real problem is not the strategy to be adopted from the inside: it is that Christians remain silent in order not to give his side reprisals (as he had hoped the bishop of Lahore, Lawrence Saldanha), whether aloud reclaim their rights, they are always under fire. The biggest responsibility is, rather, out of the international community and NGOs will have to exercise the necessary pressure on Islamabad to repeal or at least mitigate the blasphemy law.
While the situation lends itself to international diplomatic dilemmas hamletic and too many disturbing shadows, the light is right counterpoint to the testimony of Shahbaz Bhatti, a man who, before the needy, the poor, the hungry and thirsty never pulled back, even at the cost of their lives. The commitment to human and Christian Bhatti were for one thing. "I say that as long as I live, until his last breath, I will continue to serve Jesus and this poor, suffering humanity," he said in an interview the minister assassinated. "I do not want popularity, I do not want positions of power," insisted. He then took their positions in government, for pure spirit of service. As is often ruthless in the dynamics of power, Bhatti had been proposed to abandon its humanitarian ambitions in exchange for a rapid rise in prestigious roles. He had the courage to say no, at the cost of threats and attempted attack against himself and against his family. But Shahbaz Bhatti, aware that, as Tertullian says, "The blood of martyrs is the seed of new Christians," had long since accepted their fate, whatever it would be: "I consider myself privileged if (...) Jesus would accept the sacrifice of my life. I want to live for Christ and for Him I die. I feel no fear in this country. "

(Source: Luke Marcolivio, optimism, March 10, 2011)

Pvc Pipe Burst In Freezing

Between Rosy Bindi and Gianfranco Fini ...

What they have in common Gianfranco Fini and Rosy Bindi? According to the book "Tour of the Catholic Right," written by Peter Vassallo and published by Editions Solfanelli, the two "are the perfect interpretation of two unpleasant choices, which - eventually - find themselves in mutual sympathy for the absence of a real political plan." According to Vassallo "An impressive string of blunders and misunderstandings that have alienated Catholics [Bindi] by their natural political position and the right [Fini] Catholic from its natural roots." Pierre Vassallo, who was born in Genoa in 1933, is professor emeritus of the Theological Faculty of Northern Italy. President of the Writers' free North West, author of numerous books, essays and articles. Also for issues Solfanelli is about to leave his "Right False Icons." Intrigued by the clever arguments and the vast culture of Vassallo, the Optimist has interviewed
D. What happened to Gianfranco Fini? Why are marrying the Palace of Culture, radical, anti-Catholic and anti-people? It always has been, or is it a change dictated by political expediency?
Gianfranco Fini was trained at the School of Giorgio Almirante, idealistic, unprincipled and Pirandello at war with the principle of identity and non-contradiction (definitions only apparently paradoxical: after all Almirante betrayed the duplicity of his thought confessing to have two "gospels" The letters of St. Catherine of Siena and the Prince of Machiavelli). Along the way Fini has abandoned the idealism (a lightweight, for him). You fascist state without knowing the culture of fascism, a Catholic (he was awarded the Order Plan, the papal honor given to distinguished personalities for their faith!) Without knowing the catechism, and is now without knowing the secular philosophy of the Enlightenment. His policy is one, nobody, one hundred thousand.
D. What do you mean Catholic right? What are the cultural foundations and politicians? We
the definition of a right-wing Catholic Clemente Solaro della Margarita, "I'm right those who have at heart the good of religion and state." The theoretical source of the modern right is the doctrine of natural law formulated by Giambattista Vico, and (in it) the theory of "Cesar", which contemplates the figure of a policy to resolve the tension between mob justice and oligarchy.
D. The Catholic Church has denounced the mistakes and explained the dangers of ideology and Marxist-Leninist from the beginning of the Communist International. How was it possible that, after Vatican II, there were many Catholics who have become activists in the PCI and subsequent variations on the theme: Olive, Democratic Left and now the Democratic Party?
the late twenties Catholic culture has been infiltrated historicist creeping opinion (he showed masterful Father Antonio Messineo) in the essay by Jacques Maritain, Integral Humanism. In consequence of this infiltration has spread a state of mind contemplating the need for a political agreement between the Catholics and the revolutionary left (seen as unwitting carriers of Christian needs). As pointed out in his essay Paolo Emilio Taviani autobiographical memory, the leaders of the Christian Democrats were occupied by maritainiani convinced. Pius XII tried to rectify the political culture of the Christian Democrats (see for example the Christmas radio message in 1944). For its part, has suggested Guido Gonella (1944) Dc to a constitution in accordance with the principles of traditional Catholicism. Unfortunately, De Gasperi has ignored the teaching of Pius XII and rejected the draft constitution proposed by Gonella. The DC was thrown headlong into the path marked by Maritain. The results of this choice are unhappy under the eyes of all. The desired reconstruction of a political movement of Christian inspiration, therefore, should begin by reading highly critical of De Gasperi.
D. Along with the Nazi-Soviet regime was the most brutal and violent regime of the twentieth century. What the two ideologies have in common? And why we talk so little of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism?
Nazism and communism have in common hatred of the God of justice. Communism and Nazism were able to tolerate a powerless Christ, separated from the ancient Testament (I think of the German Christian movement in the Third Reich and Stalin's appeal to Russia in 1941 deep). But at the end of the two doctrines is the rejection of the God of Moses (rejection initiated by Sigmund Freud and the avant-depth neoagnostiche - Marcionite - left and right). One can not understand the essence of the two ideologies that have bloodied the twentieth century without reference to the common hatred of the God of justice.
D. What characteristics do you think Catholics should be involved in politics?
Catholics in politics should groped the difficult business of living in accordance with the Decalogue. Then they should understand that you need to start dismissing chimeras associated with the doctrine (and maritainiana Dossetti) that led the Democrats to fail. The beginning can only be a severe study. The political talk show, Vanity Fair and foolish, should be strictly avoided. First of all Catholics should, in fact, assimilate (by reading the works of Michele Federico Sciacca) the fundamental distinction between philosophy and sophistry, and the distinction of politics as production of the common good only as the policy of seizing power. So why should assimilate the Catholic philosophy, that deal with such authors as Cornelio Fabro, Augusto Del Noce, Maria Adelaide Scratching, Antonio Livi, Giovanni Cavalcoli, and so on. Without a solid cultural basis of political activity is useless if not harmful. Finally, should design a program to address the tragic hidden emergencies, such as birth control, the painful disintegration of families, the craziness of Saturday evening, the increase in suicides. Attention to these problems must be distinguished from other Catholics, who agree only on the economic front (and often only on the front of the chat).

(Source: Anthony Padovano, optimism, June 30, 2010)

Spray Tanning Slogan Ideas For New Years

Femininity released? Adoptions

The female body is devalued by a "repeated indecent representation of women as ostentatious naked traded sex offered by newspapers, television, advertising. "So stated the call for mobilization" if not now when, "but I'd be curious to know what kind of value you want linked to the sexual dignity of women.
feminists of the golden years in their magazine "Effe" - May 1976 - spoke of a sexual "free, active, which also aims to another, and can not be content with a gender that takes place only in the sphere intimate and private. Sexuality quietly admitting some differences, which states its possible "deviations", which confess without fear. "
From this definition, the step in the naked female "as an object of sexual exchange" is not so long: what is, in fact, the dignity of the female body after sexual liberation 35 years ago advocated by feminists of "Effe"?
Nothing, unless you want to argue that the only freedom is to do as he pleases. But then the wind of the "forbidden to forbid" was very violent, for example in 1967 in Florence, the congress of the Radical Party, was distributed a leaflet in which it was written that "the company pushes to criticize his authoritarianism the individual's right to freely dispose of his body, to enjoy the sensual pleasure. "
all began in the roaring 60's where the wings of the philosophy of Marcuse is theorized that freeing the instincts could eliminate both the domain and authority, they were kind of family, civil or religious.
During those years talking about virginity, underwear, contraceptives and positions of the Kama Sutra becomes a matter of course, on the wings of the battle for a strong female characters appear several signs that testify to the new way of being women, such as short skirts and tights, to burn the bra and the appearance of the first topless in Saint Tropez in 1970. In those years the psychiatric theorizing the sexual revolution gave manforte the need for "scientific" of this liberation of the individual, the English psychoanalyst David Cooper spoken to the women stated that they can love another being provided only to love themselves totally to the point of actually masturbating to orgasm.
So in 1973 the book "Donnie - Chronicles of feminism Roman" page. 7 is written the slogan "if we have children we want," consistent with the idea that the pleasure of the body has nothing to do with conception. We are obviously poles apart from the number recorded in 1968 the encyclical letter Humanae Vitae of Pope Paul VI pointed out where the inseparable link between the unitive and procreative sexual activity, it is no coincidence that the battle for abortion and contraception takes effect precisely from those areas of the liberation of female sexuality. And 'the 1975 closure of the famous "practice" CISA Florence (Italian Centre for Sterilization abortion) founded by Adele and I ended up under arrest for which the then twenty-seven Emma Bonino. From all these battles
perhaps the only thing that was truly "liberated" is the idolatry of the pleasure an end in itself, comes a strange concept of freedom then is paradoxically also met with some capitalist hedonism.
Morality is based on what you believe, but I would dare say that is rooted in the subject of our prayers. In this respect the above mentioned book "Woman ..." (1973) is this sentence: "if we ever will want to pray this will be our prayer: Mother I thank you for making me a woman." Amen.

(Source: Lorenzo Bertocchi, Freedom and person, February 17, 2011)

Found A Lump In My Anus

to singles: a sentence, much fanfare, a clumsy exit.

All this fuss about the Supreme Court ruling on the adoption of Russian children by a single Italian woman I do not understand it. Or maybe I understand only too well the retropensiero of who fired the news so upside down, distorting it, as if the Court of Cassation had launched a revolutionary new season of case law acknowledging for the first time single persons to adopt children.
The Supreme Court on the precise spot, he said the opposite. He said that the adoption of minors, Italian or foreign, can not be accorded to individuals. And it did not accept, but rejected the request. He was admitted, just as it was before, a report of a different nature, which in the jargon of the lawyers call "adoption mild" and that looks like a long-term expectations, but without the status of a legitimate child. The analysis of the rules of our system was accurate and timely, plus in the wake of previous decisions, one of which (dating more than five years ago) is exactly the same in the grounds and in the system: the possible adoption by married couples, and not by single. Nothing new under the sun.
But then, how did the clamor? Who has mounted, and why? Is that the last sentence of the sentence, just in the queue, said that the Strasbourg Convention of 1967 gives the legislature the power to expand the adoption legitimizing, if you would admit the individual. Has anyone seen this queue in the spark to light the fire of a revolution, the hope, the call, the warning to Parliament, and the need to open and who knows than anything else. Last night the Supreme Court has issued a statement saying that the meaning was not, no solicitations or demands. Unusual procedure firefighter on a fire invented by others?
For the legal logic, it is quite true that the Strasbourg Convention does not require and does not forbid and released by national legislators, and the phrase itself is flawless, so. Only it stuck there, a decision to talk over, like a wedge, it can seem really a kind of winking, then fade as to the logic of Mr. Venerable. Well unlike the Supreme Court in 2006, cited today as the source of this final thought, had defended his freedom of prohibition, because "the eligibility in principle the adoption of the single legitimating, in addition to light not unfounded doubts of constitutionality, would undermine the provisions of current legislation, "and so" deeply distorting the institute. " The phrase now is incomplete. It is not wrong, but is incomplete, and thus is even more wrong because it deceives.
the legislature "could", we already knew from before, without Strasbourg disengaged herself. But it will not, why not violate its constitution. Nor betray treaties that require obedience to all the choices in the best interest of the child, from which there is comparable to the desire of an individual endless supply of accommodation of adoptive mothers and fathers in the waiting list. With us, the same plant on the adoption law is entitled "Right of the child in a family." It does not say "assistance," says the family. And that family is defined in Article 29 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court knows it, and decided in a manner consistent, and that is what counts. Could save that output clumsy, that's all.

(Source: Joseph Anzalone, Future, 2/16/2011)

Speed Skater Underwear

scandal in London: the government wants gay marriage to church

Attentive Andrea Tornielli puts us aware of how things are going in the English house. What should make us think is that so many of our politicians who call themselves Catholics, did not hesitate to ally and openly flirting with the current Italian political secular, and designed an identical "social achievement" for our country. According to which Catholic principles? For the achievement of such "rights" religious and ethical? It is clear that this duplicity on the part of "our" representatives (but "our" to whom?, Not the Catholics!) Is intended only to protect their own interests, keep your lower back firmly to the throne of power! Other than non-negotiable principles. Here, everything is negotiable, from personal dignity up to their beliefs religious. If they had any. We think a moment about the various Bindi, Franceschini, Prodi, Casini, Rutelli & Co. Instead of preening on television, filling his mouth banal platitudes, standing as champions of the moral sense and the restatement of Christian values \u200b\u200b(perhaps these Carnival for their help to this?) would do well to make a serious examination of conscience. But maybe they do not have time, I'm too busy! But we feel Tornielli: "Homosexual persons in the United Kingdom will be able to bless the wedding in their places of worship and the government of his majesty will recognize. The news yesterday emblazoned on the front pages of the Telegraph and the Sunday Times. Within the next few days could then drop the ban now in force, which prohibits conduct the ceremonies of civil unions between homosexual persons in religious buildings. The reform, according to the plan that has been studied by the British Minister for Equal Opportunities, the Liberal Democrat Lynne Featherstone, will therefore contain religious elements such as hymns and reading of sacred books, and will be presided over by priests, pastors, rabbis and other ministers religious.
In Britain, civil unions for gays and lesbians were introduced in 2005 and the legislation provides that they must have a secular course absolutely no religious elements. Even if, before the law, States United States civil same-sex couples have the same rights as those formed by a man and a woman who joined during a religious ceremony, the effects of which civilians are recognized by the state.
It is clear that the reform, opening the possibility of blessing of the marriage for gay people, will help to thin almost all the differences between civil unions and traditional marriage. Suday The Times explains that the proposed reform of the Marriage Act would also permanently change the legal definition of marriage as a union only between a man and a woman. The decision would therefore have a high symbolic value. "The government is considering what should be the next step for civil unions, such as some religious organizations can help to same-sex couples to register their relationship in a religious context if they want to do it, "said an Interior Ministry spokesman. "The ministers have met a number of people and organizations - he added - in due course an announcement will be made."
The Church of England, although in the past two decades has introduced many liberal reforms, has already responded letting them know that will not allow such ceremonies in their religious buildings. "The proposal - said a spokesman for the Anglican - could have an unexpected impact and lead to confusion." The Anglican community, however, are very diverse, and there are cases of the wedding blessing gay. As well as cases of Anglican priests who have publicly stated that living with another man.
Other Christian religious groups, such as Quakers and Protestant denominations, as well as the liberal British Jews, are available to accommodate these ceremonies in their respective places of worship.
In Italy, a few months ago the news of blessing the union of two lesbians by the Waldensian pastor of Trapani and Marsala. While the Catholic Church, since the seventies, and similar ceremonies were celebrated by the semi-clandestine Catholic priest Don Franco Barbero, then dismissed from the clerical state as a result of this activity in direct conflict with the magisterium. In July 2003, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, then headed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, published a document, approved by Pope John Paul II, to declare all the opposition of the Catholic Church and the recognition of homosexual unions, which "obscure basic values \u200b\u200bwhich belong to the common heritage of mankind."

(Source: Andrea Tornielli, Il Giornale, 14 February 2011)

People Who Refuse Gifts

No, dear Tarquinio: the procession is not a Christian moralist

not convince me, and I do not mean to debate the future of editorial released yesterday and signed by its director, Mark Tarquinio, whose daring costume intellectual states that if a woman would be in place today. The disguise not so much to imagine a woman as any novelist, even if not necessarily homosexual, must constantly cope with the diversity - in thought and body - of which we are all facts.
What is not persuaded that Tarquin would be in place only if it were a woman. But since it is not, will not go there. Why? There will be Antonio Di Pietro, Nichi Vendola, Gad Lerner: Why should not there also Mark Tarquinio? Why should it be present at that time only if it were a woman? Why settle for hoping that the square-female "and not s'arrovelli s'arroventi 'if not then he will be there, to contribute to this effect?
In short, it seems to me that Tarquin, although the level of his speech, which are not foreign accents really lyrical, in the end not just the stories, because if you tell it right, if you really wanted, as he himself wrote the first line of his editorial , to prevail on politichetta love, then it should put your finger in the pie, because we know that love does not prevail on politichetta alone, and that's good wishes and good intentions are part, of course, the paving of ' hell.
He says it himself - and on this I disagree - that "in reality we all unfortunately." If you really believe in this thing, then go to the end. In the square. A scream. But I still do not believe in this resistance and (possibly empty Tarquinio judge) I find one of the few reasons to engage intellectually in these sad days in which each of us seems forced to choose between the silly and the joy of the bunga bunga gloom moralist of Eco, Saviano and Zagrebelsky.
The reality is, beloved Tarquin and ultrapersonale numinous entity: the reality does who wants to do, whether secular or Catholic or even a bishop. Look what he wrote in 1973, or thirty years ago, the Jesuit Michel de Certeau: "Any debate about the practices or civil life in the public arena invariably brings an ecclesiastical character and speeches religious. These characters and this conversation no longer intervene as witnesses of truth. They play quite a role play. They are part of the repertoire of social commedia dell'arte. "
goes without saying that the problem of degradation reached by the image of women in our society exists. But I do not underestimate, as it does Tarquin, the problem of "non-passing of the baton 'between the old feminist movement, which includes figures of heroic women, and the young generation of our time.
In fact, that failure to pass lies a problem that affects us all. There was a time when the feminist movement could assert itself culturally with a protagonist who, however, did not, leaving too soon absorbed by the Left parties (who were sexist as all other) or refusing to supervise the dangerous receivers, such as that of liberation through sexuality.
For years we've peeled the glossy magazines left in the image of a topless woman was a symbol of emancipation, as well as the refusal of the family and the ruthlessness of the costumes in the spirit of renewal of society were considered the ne plus ultra of the fight for the liberation of women.
This confusion, which were unable to cope with the minds of great value, is unresolved, not only for the image of women, but - metaphorically - For all our lives. There was a time when the thought, thinking as such, ie the ability to think freely, and justified in our condition, has been absorbed in a vacuum of freedom in which even the finest minds have been reduced to theatrical appearances, to actors, just as the prelates he was talking about Michel de Certeau.
What do you think I care, dear Tarquinio, a square with Di Pietro, Nichi Vendola, Game Aulenti and Cortellesi? What words can we expect to hear? The dramatic conditions in which many of our poorest children to without even realizing it will not receive any light from this event, indeed: his uselessness could only produce a little ' of hope in the least, a bit 'more of darkness.
One thing I beg you, she runs a day so important and potentially free: Forget the reality shows and comedy, and stop with the usual old story of cattolichese "differentiate by participating," as she does, approving the But putting the dots on the square i. Enough with the dots on the i. Everyone should put the game away in the sunshine.
As for me, I hope every day in God, so my words are not empty as those who claim to fight. No one can be considered a priori the side of truth, let alone if it catholic. For this, dear Tarquinio, let us beware of those who, instead - And today there are many - it is considered such.

(Source: Andrea Tornielli, Il Giornale, 13 February 2011)

Sample Invites To A Clothes Exhibition

Toh! From that pulpit!

There they are, today, the companions of the time. They did not make the revolution, but many have careers and money. And the arrogance is often remained the same. Under the gray hair and baldness roars again the young fanatic ever since.
The only revolution that have made - or rather, who have served - was the sexual revolution. For the consumption of the consumer society. Today, the belly, bobbing behind their tie of wealthy journalists, powerful politicians, university barons, warns and rebukes. E - behold! - What?
against the unbridled sex (obviously not his own but that of Berlusconi). Frowning pontificating against sex disposable weave prayers on the moral dignity of women, teach us the sacred respect for the female body, preach moral rigor. In some cases, from a life of a generation that has known - after the sexual anarchy of youth - a succession of marriages and relationships ...
The show is amazing. Perhaps it is even an opportunity for reflection. I have refrained until now from writing about the miseries of the news and I answered no to some political talk shows who wanted to invite me to "judge a Catholic" the "nights of Arcore. However
weeks I see and hear some former revolutionaries, inspired air and virginal purity, raise their loud cry against those who profane pictures with scantily clad "women's bodies", against those whose sexual mores and wild - in disbelief - I rub my eyes .
Not only remembering the youth seasons. I wonder: what newspapers have written so far? Which week? What had the cover? Women wearing burkas? And what books have launched? What films and filmmakers who have exalted? What costumes have practiced and legitimized? What moral claimed?
Suddenly everyone seems to have become castigatissimi censors. It was inevitable that such a band of Puritans is next to Oscar Luigi Scalfaro being, he, a bigot of the first hour. Remember the episode that made "immortal"? It made the scene in the fifties to a lady, accidentally caught a glimpse of the restaurant, guilty of having a low-cut dress. The event "for the dignity of women", therefore, will attend this Scalfaro. And I read that
Republic "will also attend Nichi Vendola: Another Italian history is possible, there is a better Italy for which women are not cannon fodder, commercialization of bodies, the stars in only one establishment to escort".
Yes, dear Nichi (in the role the moral theologian), Italy this exists. Are you sure that is exactly what you want for decades?
is left of this wonderful slogan: "I'm man enough to say." But enough for what? The famous "sexual freedom"? The slogan "the body is mine and manage it? A sessuomania this mass?
Let's talk. Last May I took part in an episode of "Annozero" on priests and pedophilia. It was very interesting, but I remember when I tried to broaden the horizon by proposing to analyze the (often pathological) sessuomania mass that characterizes our customs and our culture, Santoro broke off the conversation move on. Not considered interesting. Yet this is the stifling atmosphere.
I am a father, I have young daughters and it sucks a society where young women - in any environment! - Are discriminated against if they are not in the game or do not accept certain compromises. It sucks a society where girls or boys are branded as idiots if they say they believe in chastity or virginity.
Or where you are considered dangerous if a person says that marriage is only between a man and woman, if you insist to say that gender is not an opinion (that nature - either male or female - is debatable), if you consider divorce an evil, whether it condemns abortion, the morning after pill and if you dare question the "sacred condom revered by the dominant culture.
Some people try to yank some Christians to wrest their excommunication of the sinner Berlusconi. Gad Lerner has amplified the voice of the nun who thundered, "It is not lawful" against the Cav as the Baptist against Herod.
Good. But with the nun - About Erode - thunder "it is not lawful," even against a dominant culture that has to be global, legalized abortion in the coming fifty years to score a billion, a culture that increasingly lower the level of protection of human life.
And I would remind the little nun that John the Baptist thundered especially against the hypocrisy of the scribes and Pharisees, he called: "You brood of vipers."
Even Jesus will thunder against them. He shows compassion for the sinners, tax collectors and prostitutes, but not for the "whitewashed tombs" that points the finger at other people's sin: "they are beautiful to look at the outside, but inside are full of dead men's bones and all rot. "
E 'of all of us talking. Because of a great sinner like Zacchaeus, Jesus can make a saint, a great saint like Paul or Augustine. But of those who presume to judge others, the whitewashed tombs? Moreover they will be with his finger pointed at Jesus' right under the cross.
were saying the event for the dignity of women. Will defend the dignity trampled on Muslim women on the continent?
and dignity of Christian women in Pakistan, the dignity of Asia Bibi, a young mother sentenced to death, still held and subjected to any humiliation, for the Christian?
E 'Christianity which required women to recognize their dignity.
Roberto Benigni himself, commenting on the "prayer to the Virgin" of Dante, had this to say: "God himself has since asked Mary her yes or no that its women gained the right to say yes or no" .
Just yesterday we were celebrating St. Agatha, Virgin and martyr. The story of this young man in the third century shows us the only true revolution that restored dignity to women. Certainly not the culture of the Republic and the Espresso or the common (or, of course, the television culture). But only Jesus Christ.

(Source: Anthony Socci, synthesis Available in The Citadel, February 8, 2011)

Bmi For Women Over 20

The protest of the 143 theologians and secular faith in the West of double standards

was the time of the Cologne Declaration, ie for more than twenty years, so numerous that a cartel theologians do not put together to produce a document against the centralism of Rome calling for reforms to the Church.
Centoquarantatrè professors of faculties Theological German, Swiss and Austrian announced in recent days, a text entitled "Church 2011 - a change necessary." What do you ask? Of course, "radical reforms", such as the abolition of compulsory celibacy for priests of the Latin rite, and therefore open to the ordination of married men, the adoption of 'structures at all levels of the Synod of the Church ", the involvement selection process of the faithful priests and bishops, openness to women "in the ministry of the Church", the welcome of gay couples and the divorced and remarried.
The signatories believe that only by opening up to these reforms, precisely "a necessary turning point," the Church will accelerate again and go back to talking to the men and women of the twenty-first century. The list does not appear at all surprising. Those who believe the theologians who signed the proposals are in fact needed to be done very well known and debated for decades.
Some of these appear to be very self-referential and clerics. It is true, for example, that the decline in vocations is beginning to be a problem in the West, and it is true that in Germany and Austria there are many cases of priests who live with women and do not hide it, but really the abolition of rule of celibacy is the answer to this situation? Again, really the answer to the crisis of faith is open to women in ministry the Church? I really think that a change in doctrine on homosexuality would lead to refill the half-empty churches?
Just look at what happened in the Anglican Church to realize that the answer to secularization secularization can not be another, as evidenced by the constant hemorrhage of the faithful in spite of the increasingly liberal place (up from the priesthood and the episcopate to women 'openness to gay priests living together). What is striking about the 143 initiative is the fact that theologians are cyclically re-open questions without taking into account the fact that these issues reflected the teachers' union and has taken more than once.
Yet, despite pronouncements, encyclicals, pastoral letters, papal intervention, it is as if every time you ripartisse from scratch. Themes proposed in the document there is only one that really has to do with the experience of a number, unfortunately, more and more people, and that's about the attitude of the divorced and remarried and the question of the sacrament Eucharist.
Benedict XVI, homily Saturday at the ordination of five new bishops, said: "The pastor must not be a reed swamp which bends according to the wind, a servant of the spirit of the time. Being brave, the courage to oppose the current of the moment belongs to an essential task of the shepherd. It should not be a reed swamp, but - according to the image of the first Psalm - it must be like a tree that has deep roots in what is solid and well founded. This has nothing to do with the rigidity ol'inflessibilità. Only where there is stability there is also growing. "
Of course, the Pope spoke of bishops, not the theologians. But these words offer food for thought for all. We are very confident that the 'change necessary' to strengthen their faith in the secularized and de-Christianized society should have to do with church ministries, the discipline of celibacy, etc..? The
11 May 2010, in Lisbon, the Pope said: "It is perhaps putting too much trust in the structures and programs of the Church, the distribution of powers and functions, but what will happen if the salt becomes tasteless?.
Two days later, Fatima, said: "When, in the views of many, the Catholic faith is no longer the common heritage of society and often seen as undermined and overshadowed by a seed" gods "and the lords of this world very difficult it can touch hearts by a simple conversation or moral appeals, much less through general references to Christian values \u200b\u200b... What fascinates above all is an encounter with people who believe that through their faith, to attract the grace of Christ, bearing witness to Him. "

(Source: Andrea Tornielli, The Daily Compass, 7 February 2011)

Break Sentinel Dongletime Limit

The Paolini

Pasolini interested in reading about when he wrote against abortion, and conversely the Meeting in Rimini listened Testori: impressed us words and the depth of thought, and their sexual preferences known left us completely indifferent.
's just on the merits, then, that talk about the choice to enter a written Nichi Vendola among the ideas proposed to the priests for the Lenten sermons of this year, in a liturgical-pastoral published by Paolini. Notwithstanding that, the comparison with two great Italian culture does not encourage the governor of Puglia, some doubt arises rather scrolling the selected piece (a letter to the deceased bishop of Nichi compatriot Don Tonino Bello, written and published a year ago), for example when Vendola said Don Tonino hear a "poignant nostalgia of your cosmogony," or when he asks: "Where is the Passover of social responsibility and cultural conviviality?", or even when accused: "There are those who would like to put on a Ku Klux Klan version of Po. Can frankly hard to take them as starting points for clarifying a deep reflection on the mystery Resurrection of Our Lord, but so be it. The point, however, is another.
Vendola The letter is accompanied by a box, inserted by the editors of the book, titled "Wisdom of the Fathers", with an episode in the life of a great monaco the fourth century, Bessarion, which "happened in a church during the sermon's touched to hear the priest cast a sinner, unworthy of being considered among the good people. Bessarion did not move an eyelid, he got up and walked out with him saying, 'I too am a sinner'. "
At this point a question naturally arises in us all, sincere and enthusiastic members of the fan club monaco Bessarion: we wonder if the piece is not is not a huge excusat petita an incredible own goal in short, those who chose the song for Easter meditations. If so, whether the citation of Monaco was really a stop right who might turn up their nose to the meditations of Nichi Vendola placed alongside those of Mother Teresa of Calcutta, then we wonder also whether the publishers of liturgical Pauline are the same publishers Famiglia Cristiana magazine, that a year ago was meditating on the theme: "Communion in Berlusconi's right?" the same as always with respect to the prime minister, has put the question to readers of his "state of the disease, something uncontrollable. " In short, two sinners, two measures? And Bessarion would agree? At least for Lent one should meditate on. Unless it is the beginning of a rethinking of Pauline, which next year will bring us to meditate on a thought of the Cav.

(Source: Assuntina Morresi, The Gazette, February 2, 2011)

How Do U Make Hazel Eyes Pop?

Poor Italy!

Poor Italy! Forced by surveys and newspapers and now a political strategy that does not stop at nothing to get passionate about women's panties Premier! A measure on the private morals of a man, on his personal weaknesses, his flaws, rather than on his government.
Poor Italy! Forced by investigations of judges politicized and newspapers and state television to stir the mud of a story that has nothing to do with the real problems, things that would be good to discuss.
Poor Italians, some rubbish everywhere, even from the private conduct of the premier (which certainly would be different if it were better), but mainly those who have the interest to boost each other, to put it in joke, to talk about it every single day , to spread around the world. Italy's problems as if they were reduced to the past of Miss Ruby.
The strategy is clear: to divert attention from the general activity and reform agendas of government, important issues such as federalism, judicial reform and tax, because the dirty water is thrown out the baby. A strategy by bombers, kamikaze, a collective suicide.
Strana Italy, bigoted Italy, where sexual morality seems to count more than anything else. This, at least in the newspapers and television in the living, because it seems that the real country is on the same line. So here is those who are scandalized because the prime minister gives his mobile phone to the ladies who make nice with him, hoping to become papers, letters, Professorin and so on. And no one to stumble with the same vehemence if the politician gives his henchman to the cell that gives him the votes and getting the public place (at the expense of all) for themselves and their relatives. There is a substantial difference: Berlusconi pays his own pocket, while in Italy for decades, were placed in the public service character squalid, low-profile, of dubious moral qualities and work skills, only to perpetuate the power system, the damage the public budget, swelling the national debt.
At present, in Italy, if it were a normal country, the newspapers should speak exclusively investigation on waste in Campania, where there is an army of professionals with more than double of what it takes for the disruption that is visible to everyone. Now that's a moral issue, yes which is a real problem! Who ruled in Campania in all these years should be fired as headlines in all the papers. The deepening political broadcasts (the ones where we see the much vaunted freedom of the press) should be constantly on the piece, to dig there, in rubbish. An exemplary process, public, continuous disapproval of certain degenerate policy should be the center of attention, should give important signals, should put to shame the negative behavior to educate young people to do otherwise. Instead ... Instead
by Santoro gives way to a lady of dubious morality, spent by the doubts and questionable credibility. One, which believes neither the mother nor the ex-boyfriend, and even the judges themselves, the evening becomes a protagonist, the mouth of truth, the revelation of who knows what secrets. Except then be denied the next day by its own contradictions. Who will repair the wrong, idiocy, the harm done by the broadcast paid by the Italians?
better to speak of the macro to Bassolino, I understand. I understand the strategy, understand the meaning of the operation. And that is why I repeat and cry, poor Italy!

(Source: Gianluca Zappa, The Citadel, January 30, 2011)

Shareaza Connecting To Itunes

When ignorance, stupidity and ridiculous

Last example, in order of time is yesterday, and there he offers a statement Ansa in these terms: "An atheist bishop complaint for abuse of credulity."
"Administer the consecrated host, saying it was" Body of Christ "is abuse of popular credulity. To this Dante Svarc, former commander of the municipal police of Ancona and member of the Union of atheists and agnostics, rationalists, has filed a complaint against the Bishop. Menichelli. Svarc Calls acquired "wafer samples" to examine the DNA. The bishop would not comment on the incident. "
The Bishop of Christian charity does not respond correctly, but it is natural to ask: is it possible that oceanic crass ignorance in religious matters can be slaved to the incurable desire for personal publicity? If this is the rationality of the atheists is that console! A further test, however, that they're really scraping the bottom of the ridiculous! Moreover, Benedict XVI reiterated today:''The church does not fear contempt, persecution, in a society often attracted to material wealth and worldly power.'' How true!

(Source: Ansa, 29 January 2011)

Late Period And Increased Mucous

excellence go hand in hand, I disagree with his choice

The Bishop of Padua Archbishop Antonio Mattiazzo, chose not to attend the funeral Alpin Matteo Miotto not increase exaltation rhetoric that tends to turn the fallen heroes in military missions that seek to preserve peace by means of arms. Do not share that choice based, in my humble opinion, on an incomplete assessment of the events on the ground in Afghanistan.
"The Alpine Matteo Miotto rest in peace, his memory has not. The Italian survives a dilemma, a dilemma is not new, nor so compelling: it is not a hero or a hero?
Individually, this time the bishop of Miotto to raise the issue. The soldier was Thiene, the diocese is that of Padua. And the spiritual leadership of this diocese has raised noise with the decision not to hold private funerals of the fallen, simply send a letter of condolence. "The diocese was represented," said Monsignor Antonio Mattiazzo to local journalists. And maybe he could stop there. Instead, he kept an addition very clear: "Of course I am disappointed that the young man is dead. But go slowly with the exaltation of rhetoric. Do not let 'heroes. Those are not peace-keeping missions. They go there with weapons, so the meaning is different, we must not forget ...».
His Excellency, no doubt, raises dust with a position rather than ideological. For any Christian, who line up behind a coffin, it matters little that in there be a hero. Unfortunately, there's a guy that still has life left in very specific circumstances, serving a flag and a country, giving written touching the mark of an idea. It would seem natural in front of the funeral procession on the last day, there is his bishop. In this case, the bishop does not consider her worthy of the occasion. Dissociates. Certainly Bishop Mattiazzo has a thousand reasons when he wants to escape the rhetorical chorus. Too often the patriotic and militaristic emphasis dominates ruthlessly true mourning. Normal and perhaps even a duty to deny that the religious rite of superlatives profane epic. But in his position would have a unique opportunity to climb the pulpit to address the funeral in person and celebrate his second conviction of faith, the right thing. Instead the soldier
Miotto is a bishop who decides to avoid the rhetoric of dodge. With all due respect, difficult to understand. You can not share. But there's more. Monsignor Mattiazzo also expressed its disagreement with the whole nature of the Italian expedition, siding openly: we're not going to bring peace, let's go to war.
Back to resurface the vexed and unresolved issue. The bishop confronts in the most straightforward and uncompromising: where there are no weapons, no war. An Evangelical Church and the spiritual in the strict sense can not accept in any case the use of force. This the noble and respectable location. But things in practice, most are pretty darn complicated. There are times and circumstances that require the strength to defend the defenseless. The Church herself, years ago, he agreed with the military intervention to stop the horrors in Kosovo. It certainly would not have anything to say if in different parts of the world today, more money to defend the Christians persecuted by the satraps and regimes, from hatred and intolerance.
are the speeches of all time. Since its birth, the Church is divided on the interpretation of the message. It was worthy witness the same San Francisco, which saw the birth of even one of its very sharp divisions: one is the strict application literal and the Gospel, even speculated that the absence of cathedrals and monasteries, of rules and hierarchies, the other a more historicized and more realistic, therefore, open to the structures, rules and institutions. The centuries pass, but we are always the starting point. The weapons ever, the weapons some of the time. But even the bishop of Padua, in his rush pacifist, denying an obvious truth: we can all think of our soldiers, not that they are around the world to unleash tensions, violence, injustice and abuse. If an item on this poor nation collects the unanimous admiration internationally, this is undoubtedly the human approach and fair, peaceful and moderate Our shipments.
lord, with all the humility that is appropriate: continue to believe in its absolute ideals and defend its intransigent positions, but try to separate between the inscrutable political strategies and the role of our military. Perhaps, in retrospect, the funeral of Matthew Miotto to appear as a big opportunity lost. She was found in a position to sweep away the rhetoric and simply recognizing the importance of death. It was not necessary to call him a hero. Only letters that Matthew has left written, a good bishop would surely have found the words to paint him as a generous guy, clean, idealistic. A righteous man. More than a hero. "

(Source: Cristiano Gatti, Il Giornale, January 24, 2011)

How To Unremove A Post On Face Book

Venus

Perhaps you realize what is really the beauty, only when you are so weak that he is unable to possess. A film about a dirty old man and a young free use of the brain. Poetry lurks everywhere, and Bertha scovatela. Disinfestiamoci, just to know.
The trailer is not seen well, the film is.

Vegan Snowboard Bindings

The turnaround shameless opportunists hardened

"And the rush to pull the anti-clerical robes of the Pope," writes Mario Giordano, commenting on the intervention of Cardinal Bertone on recent news stories (Il Giornale, January 21, 2011) . He continues: "But you see now are all papists now. Silence speaks Cardinal Bertone. And kneel. Spoke to the Vatican. And make the sign of the cross. To all eternity. But how? It was not interference? Dangerous invasions? Indelicate interference? What happened? Simple: they are all papists now. So even papists who feel compelled to give lessons to the Pope, pulling the robe and explaining what to do. There's Don Aldo Cazzullo doctrine teaches that the columns of the Corriere della Sera, is the daily act that demonstrates the right way to the Pope in the Gospel of Labor. And then, a long string of editorials that appear encyclicals, interviews that seem parables, articles that seem to paragraphs in the catechism: suddenly all pious and religious, devoted to the Pope, provided he hurry to condemn this devil of a Berlusconi , which has so much pity for his fault, his fault, his greatest fault. Amen. Do you remember the giornaloni proud of their secularism, the editorial anticlerical, the fiercest critics of the Vatican? Remember those who attacked the Church, the immoral, mocked retrive the positions in terms of ethics? Do you remember those who offended the Pope in the Piazza Navona guilty for not having special sympathies for Gay Pride? Remember those who mocked him for not yet having sex marriages celebrated in St. Peter? And those who blamed the beatification of the blame for the failure of unions and zapatero jolly? Well, forget everything, everything changed: now they have become the moral guardians of orthodoxy, the Templars of the theological virtues, the order of the sacred altar boys chastity. And those interventions of the Church until the other day were considered grim interference clerical attacks or the secular state, now become the Lord's blessings. Expected as a gush of cold water in the desert or as an idea in your head Rosy Bindi.
"The Pope will not be silent," the editorial intimate-sermon on the front page of the Fact. "We need a word from the Church more explicit," echoed the editorial-sermon of Reverend Cuneo Cazzullo Corriere della Sera. And then it all hang down from the lips of a Cardinal Bertone (spoke! Has spoken!), Waiting for the Cardinal Bagnasco (speak? He will not talk?) And directly invoking excommunication of Pope Benedict XVI, perhaps during the Angelus on Sunday, why not? ? While waiting for the journalists pass the time in a very pious, becoming enlightened by the word of the friars of St. Francis of Assisi or kneeling in front of the regent of the Apostolic Penitentiary, the Vatican tribunal of sins and punishment, eager to see Berlusconi saddled with a severe penance (ten Our Father, 50 Hail Mary, abstinence from meat and a pilgrimage of atonement at the Quirinale).
But you see now are now all devoted, almost baciapile. Until some time ago depicted the church as a congregation of child molesters, pedophiles hardened, slipped into depravity and institution has lost its moral authority. Now, suddenly, however, are all apostolic Roman Papal to the core, he is almost a stiff neck forced to look to the window that lights up in St. Peter's Square. Ah, Cardinal Bertone! Ah, the excommunication! Ah, the doctrine of faith! Ah, the Inquisition and the Congregation of the Clergy! Was for them at this point, would return to the Inquisition as well. In the face of the secular state: in order to give him to Berlusconi, would accept the interference of Torquemada, published in the Catechism of Pius X handouts and turning Savonarola in the new idol of the Republic, in the expectation that Veltroni will stop being as temperature when the satellite is Campobasso whims: not reached.
For Catholics it's nice to discover suddenly so many new brothers in faith, now ex-eater bigots of the last hour, ready to use the Pope as if it were a parliamentary IDV, willing to jump on Bertone's words to attack Giovanardi, excited, as only newbies can be, to launch appeals to believers to rebel Berlusconi immorality under the sixth commandment. With the goal, perhaps, to form a beautiful rainbow government, The Sound of Music, Vendola, Bonino, gay marriage, unmarried couples, fertilization and euthanasia Frankenstein style. Who knows how it will be so happy, the Vatican, right? Just ask the new priests in the newspapers We make the sermon to the Pope, what can you do? We are still stuck to the old catechism. That for which the Pope does not hold for the cassock. And the bunga bunga, as unseemly, it is always better than a menage a trois. "
peregrina final consideration: if the wiretapping issue instructions pm also on private character type Bindy, Vendola, Bonino, Franceschini, Fini, Di Pietro and whatever ' others, that today they tear their clothes in public, you think that it will turn out? So would it not be better to ponder: "Who is without sin cast the first stone"?: After all morality invoked by Bertone in public life, is not one way, that is for everyone! For the Cassandras newsboy.

Brazilian Wax In Wilmington Nc

can spare us the details, please?

We are not bigots, we live in the world. We do not want to impose censorship or tear their hair out by the indignant in the name of morality. But it seems that these days has really hit rock bottom.
The most serious newspapers are full of spicy details, background of erotic innuendo of pornography. In the morning, while in the car and accompany their children to school, you take off the radio because the news reports are all a pure two-way un'indugiare on details of the sexual exploits of girls in the court of the premier.
Not to mention the entertainment programs, that from morning till night, regardless of age protected are full of spicy details. All now vie for Ruby, the Moroccan busty girl to whom - said in all sincerity - very few would give the same age as. All
thunder against the exhibition of intimate parts of women, disqualifying the trade of women's bodies, sex reduced to squalid bargaining chips for the purpose of career. Meanwhile, the ones that flare up, continue to transmit news, to put the page, to baste talk show, to offer insights that are inevitably end up there. Continue, in short, to make audience in the name of freedom of the press, with its women's bodies.
clear: no one wants to put bibs or impair into question the freedom of the press. But it is doubtful whether in the name of this law is necessary to describe its every detail. Where does freedom of the press and where to start on voyeurism? To understand what happened, to frame, to provide full details, you really need this barrage exhibitionist?
There is not only sad, "Bunga bunga 'of Arcore. It had already happened with the case Marrazzo: in those weeks, there was no TV channel, there was talk show at any time of day or night that a guest had not fixed a transsexual. But the problem arises also for the tragic news of recent cases, like that of Avetrana, well explained The Compass in an interview with the philosopher Silvano Petrosino.
is not easy to imagine solutions. Codes of conduct are not enough, do not hold up. It is as if, in the name of the audience, is always pushed beyond the limit. The god is lord of Auditel undisputed in determining good and evil, right and wrong, the beautiful and the ugly. It's a big mess ...

(Andrea Tornielli, The Daily Compass, January 20, 2011)

How Long Does A Virus Last In A House

John Paul II, Blessed

The news was expected and now it is official and has been given to the Church and the world: Karol Wojtyla will be beatified on May 1, 2011. After the promulgation of decree that a miracle attributed to the intercession of John Paul II, the director of the Vatican press office, Father Federico Lombardi, said that the rite of beatification will take place May 1, Sunday of Divine Mercy. Presiding over the ceremony of beatification Benedict XVI himself.
only six years have passed since the death of John Paul II was born on 2 April 2005. Benedict XVI has departed from the canonical norms which provide for the wait of five years after his death before starting the canonical process of beatification and May 13, 2005, at the Cathedral of St. John, the Pope announced his decision to allow the opening immediate cause of the rectory to John Paul II. A waived for the first Once this rule, allowing for the immediate start of the canonical process for Mother Teresa of Calcutta, who died in 1997 and was beatified in 2003 it was John Polo II.
The Congregation for the Causes of Saints, in a press statement, said, "were observed in full canonical provisions regarding the common causes of beatification and canonization ... The legal validity of the canonical process was recognized by the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints Decree of 4 May 2007 ... On December 19, 2009The Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI authorized the promulgation of the decree of heroic virtue ... The doctors of the Medical Council of the Department expressed themselves in favor dell'inspiegabilità ... science of healing [from "PD" of Sister Marie Simon Pierre Normand]. Clinics theologians, December 14, 2010 ... acknowledged the uniqueness, the antecedent and the choral invocation addressed to the Servant of God John Paul II, whose intercession was effective for the miraculous healing ... On 11 January 2011 [ the Cardinals and Bishops] of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints issued a unanimous ruling ... so, considering the miraculous cure of Sister Marie Simon Pierre, as made by God with a scientifically inexplicable, as a result of the intercession of Pope John ... Paul II. "
Benedict XVI Success of the Blessed Peter has spoken in favor of life lived in the light of the evangelical counsels of his predecessor. Therefore, I would say that the debates and discourses on whether to quickly for the canonization must yield to the decision of the Church that has no doubt of the heroic virtues and holiness of the life of John Pole II. Several times
Pope Benedict has spoken publicly about the life of God lived in the Polish Pope leaving no doubt about his spiritual heritage: "It was enough to see it when he prayed: literally immersed himself in God and it seemed like everything else in those moments was the stranger." For Benedict XVI, John Paul II "entertained an intimate conversation, singular of continuity "with God, nourished by so many human qualities and" supernatural. "
In all probability the remains of Blessed John Paul II will be translated by the Vatican Grottos, where they are now, at the chapel of San Sebastian, at the right of the nave of the Vatican Basilica of the Pietà by Michelangelo and the Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament. It 'still studying the construction of the tomb, it seems that no one can assure you if it will be a stone monument, without exposure of the body, or a display case in which the body will be exposed with his face covered by a light mask Protection, made in a wax replica of the true features of John Paul II, as it did for John XXIII.

(Source: Christian Humanism, 15 January 2011)