We are not bigots, we live in the world. We do not want to impose censorship or tear their hair out by the indignant in the name of morality. But it seems that these days has really hit rock bottom. The most serious newspapers are full of spicy details, background of erotic innuendo of pornography. In the morning, while in the car and accompany their children to school, you take off the radio because the news reports are all a pure two-way un'indugiare on details of the sexual exploits of girls in the court of the premier.
Not to mention the entertainment programs, that from morning till night, regardless of age protected are full of spicy details. All now vie for Ruby, the Moroccan busty girl to whom - said in all sincerity - very few would give the same age as. All
thunder against the exhibition of intimate parts of women, disqualifying the trade of women's bodies, sex reduced to squalid bargaining chips for the purpose of career. Meanwhile, the ones that flare up, continue to transmit news, to put the page, to baste talk show, to offer insights that are inevitably end up there. Continue, in short, to make audience in the name of freedom of the press, with its women's bodies.
clear: no one wants to put bibs or impair into question the freedom of the press. But it is doubtful whether in the name of this law is necessary to describe its every detail. Where does freedom of the press and where to start on voyeurism? To understand what happened, to frame, to provide full details, you really need this barrage exhibitionist?
There is not only sad, "Bunga bunga 'of Arcore. It had already happened with the case Marrazzo: in those weeks, there was no TV channel, there was talk show at any time of day or night that a guest had not fixed a transsexual. But the problem arises also for the tragic news of recent cases, like that of Avetrana, well explained The Compass in an interview with the philosopher Silvano Petrosino.
is not easy to imagine solutions. Codes of conduct are not enough, do not hold up. It is as if, in the name of the audience, is always pushed beyond the limit. The god is lord of Auditel undisputed in determining good and evil, right and wrong, the beautiful and the ugly. It's a big mess ...
(Andrea Tornielli, The Daily Compass, January 20, 2011)
0 comments:
Post a Comment